Archive for the 'children' Category

annoyed

Posted by LK on Jul 30 2008 | children, motherhood

At the book What to Expect the First Year. For the most part it gives some really sound advice but man, sometimes it reads like the how-to manual of maternal insanity.

To wit: not letting your child fall asleep while nursing so that you can put them down awake and they practice soothing themselves to sleep by themselves. Even the book admits that the part with the not falling asleep while nursing isn’t as realistic as it could be - because babies WILL fall asleep while nursing and there’s nothing you can do about it. They won’t wake up to pretty much anything - at least, once she’s got sleep on her mind, mine won’t. Besides, it’s so cozy an comfy for both her and me to hang out together for a while.

And that’s where my beef with the book lies. It took me a while to figure out why - but reading this kind of advice bothers me more than I expected it would so figure it out I did.

You see, the baby just feels cozy and comfy on her mom after having had a good meal. And she likes to be cozy and comfortable because it feels good. But if I don’t let her get used to this kind of comfort, then what am I teaching her? That feeling good is bad? That this is a world where, if you let on that something makes you feel comfortable, you will be punished by having your comfort taken away?

I will never teach her that, even if it makes her come to sleeping on her own later than other kids. She sleeps alone in her crib most of the night so I think there’s a good chance that letting her sleep in my arms for a bit after nursing is not wrecking her just yet.

There’s other bits like that in the book, all of them reflecting an attitude that you should raise your child to be okay with being slightly deprived. I bet they mean well but it reads so institutional. And even worse, it makes me feel like no matter what, I’ll be doing something wrong as a mother because there will always be some rule I’m not following, or if I follow it then I have to go against my instincts. Neither of which is a good place to be. And I think it’s irresponsible to claim authority and then give advice that’s pretty much unfollowable even by the author’s own admission, especially to new mothers, who can drive hemselves crazy just fine without any help from anyone else.

3 comments for now

boom-boom baby

Posted by LK on Jul 19 2008 | children

Turns out I wasn’t imagining it: there really have been more babies recently. More babies were born in 2007 than in any year since 1957, which was the peak year of the Baby Boom.

The article says this new baby boomlet is likely the result of a combination of factors: lots of immigrants having babies, lots of women in their late 30s and 40s having multiples, and more women around who are actually in their 20s and 30s starting to have babies. I think there’s a fourth factor too: people are fed up with the economic problems, the political problems, and the general hopelessness. So to inject some hope into life: they have babies! Alternatively, we want to populate the world with our kind to push out all the people we’re fed up with because we perceive them as the cause of the economic and political problems…

no comments for now

you’re still glowin’, you’re still crowin’

Posted by LK on Jun 17 2008 | Faustina, children, motherhood

She is still my little beauty.

Despite a heat rash (passed in a day), newborn acne (beginning to clear up), and the loudest farts I’ve heard in my life. I even think there’s beauty in the way she cries.

It still feels strange to talk to her: it’s like talking to a doll. But I’ve begun to slip into it sometimes. She has a sense of humor, you see. Smiles and laughs pass across her face, such beautiful ones too. Glimpses of the future, they seem to be. Today she was looking right into my face when a big smile erupted. She’d made the funniest explosion down below and I made up a rhyme for it. A Hungarian one, and as such: untranslatable. But I will swear for the rest of my life she smiled right at me because she thought it was funny.

She can spend lots of time looking, just looking - at the ceiling with sharply contrasting beams, at the one sun-yellow wall in her room, at the pattern book I place in her bassinet sometimes, at the black-and-white drawing of a cat’s head I’d put by her changing table.

And she makes funny noises when she’s not sleeping real deep, like right now.

no comments for now

motherhood, day 16

Posted by LK on Jun 10 2008 | Faustina, children, feminism, motherhood

a few hours old

She was born on Sunday, May 25.

I went into labor on my due date and, a scant 36 hours later, I had my baby. I only got the epidural 22 hours in - and I have to confess I felt prouder of myself for getting one than for getting through all those hours of relentless, unchanging contractions. You see, pain is not something I’m afraid of. What does scare me is a needle in my back. But, it turns out, what scares me even more is hours and hours of endless, unchanging, non-progressing labor. In 22 hours I progressed from a little over 3 cm dilation to a little over 3 cm dilation. At which point it seemed to me much more reasonable and somewhat less scary to say: bring on the epidural! Well, I was so scared I cried. I’m not ashamed to admit it. But really, it didn’t feel like anything and once it was done I could finally rest a bit.

Then a few hours later, still at barely more than 3 cm dilation, the doctor began to give me pitocin. Clearly, my uterus was not up to the task of getting labor going on its own. But the pitocin was not bad at all because - see above: I already had the epidural. What I did mind? The hunger. The whole damn time. Before the epidural I snuck some potato chips but they didn’t last me very long.

And then there was the pushing. And then the baby’s head popped out. Which was incredible. I didn’t watch in a mirror but feeling it? Amazing. The question of pain or no pain didn’t matter anymore. A. said her eyes were open and she was looking around, all interested, even before the rest of her body came out.

And that is how Zsuzsanna Lila Moore, my daughter, was born at 2:35 pm on Sunday, May 25, 2008. She will remain Faustina on this blog.

She was beautiful. She still is beautiful. She spent an extra week in the hospital on suspicion of an infection for which she needed antibiotics. By IV, for a whole week. My interpretation: the hospital kidnapped her because she’s so beautiful one can look straight at the sun but not at her. That’s a Hungarian expression, if you must know, and it means - I think you get what it means. I hated that week. I hated going home from the hospital crying because I had to leave my baby behind.

But now, she’s home, sleeping, eating, crying, pooping. In that order. These days she breastfeeds like nobody’s business, and I hope she keeps that up. There she is right now, sleeping in her car seat, dreaming of something that makes her want to complain a little. And then dreaming of something that made her smile. I know: I’m a terrible mother, I still haven’t gotten a more appropriate neck support for her car seat and she’s doing the newborn-neck-crook thing in it.

As for me - I am healing. Slowly. The first week I couldn’t really sit, now I can do that. Not that I like to think much about my bottom just yet. Too many unusual things going on. I still don’t walk like I used to because my hips became so stiff from carrying around a baby in my belly. On the plus side: I’ve already lost 19 pounds. On the minus side: that leaves 16 pounds to go (I gained a full 35 pounds exactly). And I bet those will be the hard ones. I am wearing non-pregnant clothes quite often now, mostly in the long, tie-waist skirt plus peasant blouse variety. I make a point of emphasizing my boobs (which are giant becase - see above: breastfeeding - one for the plus side) to distract from my gut and currently oddly-shaped butt. That’s two minuses. On the plus side, however: I’ve got amazingly lustrous and rich hair. I suppose it’ll begin to shed when the rest of my body starts to feel more normal. At least, that’s my hope. Because a good hair day every day does a lot to make up for an oddly shaped and odd-feeling body.

About breastfeeding: I have to confess I’m rather enjoying it so far. Not that every minute of it is pleasant. But it’s nice to have one thing go right, at least - to date. Notice how I count my blessings in hindsight now? Because who knows what tomorrow will be like. My milk began to come in while Faustina was still in the NICU. I rented a pump and pumped like a good little girl, though not nearly as often as the lactation consultant said I should. Because every three hours, even at night? That’s just fucking crazy.

I do feel there’s an odd double standard about formula vs. breastfeeding going on in hospitals. They really push you to breastfeed, providing literature, classes, lactation consultants and so forth, but if you say you want to, it is suddenly all about how hard it will be, how much you have to pump to get enough milk (every three hours, including at night. Right.), how you’ll probably have to feed every 2 hours (including at night) instead of every 3 or 4, like with formula. So (they add), you’re better off supplementing. At which point you say to yourself, I’m really confused. I thought this was supposed to be about helping me learn to feed my baby but instead… what just happened? Do you want me to breastfeed or do you want me to kill myself? Do you want me to give formula or do you want me to feel guilty about WHATEVER I DECIDE TO DO? One doesn’t ask these questions out loud, of course. Instead one nods sweetly and pays polite and close attention to the demonstration of how to use the breastpump. Which in my humble opinion is just like a bizarrely pastel-colored sexual torture device. In other words, if you resist the formula-industrial complex, you will be punished. In some very unpleasant ways.

The breath of fresh air, and sanity, in all this madness about breastfeeding came from the nurses. Both the labor and delivery nurses and the NICU nurses kept saying, just rest. Don’t worry, you’ll have milk when you need it, and sleep will help it come in. Whereas the lactation consultants are, apparently, only meant to drive you insane with anxiety and guilt because there’s no way a new mom can do what they say she should do. Not even after less than 36 hours of labor.

For my part, I went to the hospital for as many of Faustina’s feedings in the NICU as I could. But I made a point of resting, too, and I pumped a little bit only. Just enough to make me feel like I’m doing something for her. And never overnight: nights are for sleeping.

And that brings me to my last observation: sleeping. Faustina is working on it but doesn’t always succeed. We can’t quite figure out what keeps her from sleeping when she can’t sleep but there doesn’t seem to be anything we can do about it. And about once a day she just cries for 45 minutes or so, no matter what anyone does. Colic doesn’t seem to be the cause, that sounds and looks different, and doesn’t last as long for her. Instead more like Faustina’s got an awareness of the world that she just can’t let go of but also can’t quite respond to, not yet anyway. I’ve gotten her a few black-and-white images to look at but she’s so young she can only do that when she’s not sleepy at all. Which is very little of the time.

I can’t wait for her to grow, even while I love how she is right now: small and cuddly and sweet-smelling. I can’t believe I suddenly have my very own child.

no comments for now

moms & blogs & dooce on the Today show

Posted by LK on May 09 2008 | blogs & blogging, children, digital culture, feminism, motherhood

I rather loved the dooce interview on the Today show this Wednesday. Not because it was good. It was awful: Kathie Lee Gifford ought to be ashamed of herself. But Heather Armstrong (dooce) handled Kathie Lee’s stupidity SO elegantly. The woman is a gem, and she is also right: what she’s doing is important, it is something that makes public and visible a huge part of women’s lives that has, up to now, mostly happened in the isolation of the home, in secret, without anyone bearing witness. For the most part, mothering has thus far disappeared into silence. And all Kathie Lee could think of saying was, won’t your daughter resent you for blogging about her? Well, I don’t think Kathie Lee is really one to talk… if her children don’t already resent her for just existing, they will surely resent her for ever having asked that question.

1 comment for now

motherhood later

Posted by LK on Feb 28 2008 | children, feminism, pregnancy

Women over forty are having more and more babies in Britain, writes the Guardian (via Jezebel). Conception rates are rising among women and even men are increasingly becoming fathers at a later age. By contrast, a month ago the (also British) Independent wrote about how women should worry sooner than they do about their biological clock because trying for motherhood at a later age comes with all kinds of risks, complications, possible infertility, and all kinds of misery because women wait too long.

I’m going to believe the optimistic story, personally… And here’s why: the Independent’s report includes a couple of sentences about fatherhood at a later age also posing risks, such as a six-fold increase in autism among children of fathers over 40 (incidentally, the mother’s age is not a factor in an increased risk of autism). Yet this tidbit is conveniently buried in the report, and the only conclusion drawn is that women really need to start worrying about their age. In a deeply sexist move, no similar warning is given to men, even though, according to the article, older fatherhood also poses risks. Sexism has never struck me as particularly objective and I’m tired of the fear-mongering, especially given that, in reality, I don’t think people have as much choice as they like to think about when they have children.

In other news, my own older-woman’s-pregnancy (I’m 35) is progressing, albeit in a somewhat painful way: a few days ago Baby Girl found a way to position herself so that her head rests on a round ligament on my left side and what feels like one of her knees on a round ligament on my right side. Round ligaments are sensitive and having a head and a knee be supported by them is, shall we say, not the most pleasant sensation for me. Yet she seems to feel this is the perfect position for her, and when I manage to massage her into moving to a different spot, within minutes she settles herself right back. Preferably with a few well-placed kicks against my ribs, but I don’t mind those.

My pelvis is a cradle, literally.

I do have to confess I’m using this as an excuse to rest… instead of unpacking the dishes and books still in boxes after the move.

no comments for now

on a personal (albeit vague) note

Posted by LK on Feb 22 2008 | children, pregnancy, real life

The other day I finally got up the nerve to tell off someone who really pissed me off about a year ago. I know, I shouldn’t have waited so long but… I hate telling people off, and I firmly believe that patience and kindness are more effective methods of social interaction than hostility. And usually they are… just not always. So I told them how I was affected by what they did, in a letter. And it sure did feel good. I did this despite knowing that a) they will probably still not get it, and b) even if I ever do get a response it will be something negative.

But I feel, finally, like even the residue of all that bad stuff is leaving me: an emotional house-cleaning, of sorts.

I don’t know why but lately I’m finding myself with less and less tolerance for bad behavior. Specifically the kind where someone is completely oblivious to the fact that the inevitable and entirely foreseeable outcome of their actions is harm to someone else. I’m all for asserting oneself and going after what one wants but I do feel one needs to remember that there are other people in the universe too. By which I mean, sure, get what you want but not by taking someone else’s.

But then, I really hate passing judgement over others because I don’t think I know absolutely everything about every possible situation and what if I’m wrong? And so I usually let things go for probably too long, thinking people will just realize things on their own, given enough time. There is, however, a type of person who simply does not ever realize how their actions affect others. Instead they believe you’re weak and stupid and deserve what they’re doing to you if you’re letting them get away with it. (Just look at politics: how many oblivious and pushy people get elected to office mainly by virtue of being louder and more unpleasant than the rest of us but really not much else?) So lately I’ve come to the conclusion that letting things go with pushy and oblivious people is altogether the wrong thing to do.

I have to confess that somehow, being pregnant is what brought this home to me. Oddly, I’ve heard from other pregnant women too that they suddenly able to tell people off better than ever before. I am not yet completely sure why this is but I’m hoping it has something to do with getting ready to protect my child, if it should ever come to that. I don’t want to be a helicopter parent, not at all. But there’s something about the helplessness of a child that makes me feel there are situations in which one needs to stick up for them, even in ways one would never quite think to stick up for oneself.

no comments for now

what kind of children to raise

Posted by LK on Dec 19 2007 | children

The NYT blog Freakonomics has a post in which the question is raised as to what parents’ goals are for their kids. The Greater Good Science Center at Berkeley (writes Freakonomics author Steven Levitt) says parents’ goals should be to raise “happy and emotionally literate” children. The author disagrees and says he wants to raise children who will be “happy and successful as adults” - even if that means they’re not very happy as children. Then one commenter wonders if “emotionally literate” is just code for being nice all the time, which he feels is neither productive nor desirable, pointing out that it’s also something that’s especially difficult for young boys. I’d say that’s all the more reason to teach them how to be more emotionally literate… imagine how much less misery grown men would cause if they reconsidered their stance on being nice. I don’t think “nice” per se is the point, however, but I’ll get to that later. Another commenter points out that parents who say they just want their children to be happy drive her nuts: why not say you want them to work for a greater good, be compassionate, etc. instead - being happy is a rather individual quality, after all, and when it comes to the question of how one should live life, it is also rather beside the point because, for example, torturing small animals might make someone happy but it’s doubtful (one hopes) that their parents would really want them to be happy quite that way. Others mentioned that you really can’t define what your children will consider success because it will very likely be something different from what you think success is.

The other day A. and I were talking about what we hope our daughter will be like (provided all goes well and she’s born healthy, of  course). I said I hope she’ll be spirited, insatiably curious, and compassionate. A. said he hopes she’ll be brave. Maybe (surely, in fact) we are projecting our own values onto her: the qualities of the kinds of adults we tend to like. But in the end, that’s what it comes down to: one has to raise one’s children in a way that allows them to fit successfully into the community or society we consider ourselves a part of, or else the one they will consider themselves a part of. And there is a balancing of the interests of the individual and the interests of the community going on there, which demands, to my mind, emotional literacy. Compassion is another way to put it. Which can’t exist without curiosity (about other people, for one thing), and a form of bravery or spiritedness that gives someone the confidence to trust their perceptions, and to trust other people too. Happiness comes from that, I think.

no comments for now